Wednesday, April 28, 2010

Evangelical Archaeologists Claim Discovery of 'Noah's Ark'

thesun - The remains of Noah’s Ark have been discovered 13,000ft up a Turkish mountain, it has been claimed.

A group of Chinese and Turkish evangelical explorers say they have found wooden remains on Mount Ararat in eastern Turkey.

They claim carbon dating proves the relics are 4,800 years old — around the same time the ark was said to be afloat.

Yeung Wing-Cheung, from the Noah’s Ark Ministries International research team, said: “It’s not 100 per cent that it is Noah’s Ark, but we think it is 99.9 per cent that this is it.”

He said the structure contained several compartments, some with wooden beams, that they believe were used to house animals.

The group of evangelical archaeologists ruled out an established human settlement on the grounds none have ever been found above 11,000ft in the vicinity, Yeung said.

Local Turkish officials will ask the central government in Ankara to apply for UNESCO World Heritage status so the site can be protected while a major archaeological dig is conducted.

The biblical story says that God decided to flood the Earth after seeing how corrupt it was.

He then told Noah to build an ark and fill it with two of every animal species.

After the flood waters receded, the Bible says, the ark came to rest on a mountain.

Many believe that Mount Ararat, the highest point in the region, is where the ark and her inhabitants ran aground.
_____________________

NOTE: well, here we go again. How many times has 'Noah's Ark' been discovered? The following list describes some of the more infamous 'Noah's Ark' discoveries/hoaxes...Lon:

Nicholas II and the expedition to Mount Ararat


Conspiracy theorists believe that Nicholas II of Russia sent an expedition party to Mount Ararat in 1917 to investigate reported remains of Noah's Ark.

The Russian Imperial Air Force is reputed to have sent up to 150 men up the mountain to examine an 'anomaly' after 'a Russian pilot flying over the area reported a dark structure about the size of a battleship with a rounded-over top'.

The odds are stacked against this particular tale, as Nicholas abdicated during the February Revolution of 1917, meaning it is unlikely that the expedition was ever sent.

Some investigators have claimed that the expedition actually set off in 1916 and that after finding the 'ark' a number of photographs were taken. Unfortunately, in true conspiracy-theorist style, the photographs mysteriously disappeared after Leon Trotsky discovered their existence.

Subsequent expeditions have been unable to find the colossal structure.

Professors Mud & Stoneass

In an unfortunate case of failing to check the date, a number of papers picked up on the Kölnische Illustrierte Zeitung April 1 story on Noah's Ark.

A number of pictures accompanied the 1933 article, showing a huge boat resting on a mountainside, which were duly reprinted across the globe with translations of the article.

On April 8 1933 the Cologne-based paper admitted its tomfoolery, but even though the tale was unquestionably false, that didn't stop an intrepid group of Ark-hunters in 1972 basing their search for the lost vessel on the original article.

Fernand Navarra

When French explorer Fernand Navarra announced that he had found a five-foot section of the Ark on the slopes of Mount Arat, people were, it seems, justifiably sceptical of his claims.

The Forestry Institute of Research and Experiments of the Ministry of Agriculture in Spain dated the wood at 5,000 years old, seemingly vindicating Navarra's claims. However, it was later discovered that the samples are actually only between 725 and 535 years old and that Navarra had in fact simply bought the wood from a nearby village.

George Jammal

George Jammal claimed in 1993 that he had found a section of 'sacred wood from the Ark' in a CBS documentary. The expedition, according to Jammal, was long, arduous and even claimed the life of his friend Vladimir.

In fact, the entire story was a deliberate hoax designed to fool the media, at the centre of which was a lump of timber that had actually been lifted from Californian train tracks.

Evangelical Archaeologists Claim Discovery of 'Noah's Ark'




 photo STRICKLER-SMALLBANNER_zps538bedc8.jpg

Have you had a close encounter or witnessed something unusual? Send us an email


AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

4 Comments:

Blogger Postal38sp said...

If it were a 3rd party I would be more inclined to believe this story.

11:58 PM  
Blogger Kamma said...

While I remain skeptical about the existance of the ark, I do think it's a fantastic story and I'll continue to follow the news until I get sick of the fakes.

1:12 AM  
Blogger Jum said...

I think it very likely the "discovery" is mistaken, and instead the result of searchers who are overeager for confirmation of personal beliefs and/or the fame and riches which would certainly attain to such a momentous discovery, were it true. It's not beyond the realm of possibility this is yet another case of outright fraud.

How.ev.er. I think it telling that you, having for tears been willing to swallow whole the most ludicrous,specious, bogus-on-the-face stories, suddenly develop a case of the skepti-coccus when presented with a story which, if true, would tend to support a Biblical account.

Your slip is showing.

2:51 AM  
Blogger J.Griffin said...

I kinduv have to go with Jum on that one.

You tend to get pretty contemptuous towards any "religious"
claims or activities while being very,shall we say,
"optimistic" towards everything else!

Still,
I do remember that you did give credence and respect to one fellow who was essentially a deliverance minister that you had on a while back.

If we think that science and "religion" are incompatible and fundamentally opposed,
perhaps our views of science are just as narrow-minded as our religious views...
as a race.

Sir Isaac Newton certainly had no such conflicts-
he spent a very large part of his life studying The Bible.

3:51 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

PREVIOUS POSTS


7Search.com - Affordable PPC Advertising - Quality Traffic and Low Bid Prices Equal a Better ROI

Please help support
'Phantoms and Monsters'
Thanks!

Have you had a close encounter or witnessed something unusual?
Send us an email


* * * * *

Creative Commons License
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Hotlinking of P&M Network images and copyrighted material is strictly forbidden unless permission is obtained.

'Phantoms and Monsters' is protected under the Lanham (Trademark) Act (Title 15, Chapter 22 of the United States Code)


Disclaimer:
The publication of any and all content e.g., articles, reports, editorials, commentary, opinions, as well as graphics and or images on this web-site does not constitute sanction or acquiescence of said content unless specified; it is solely for informational purposes.

Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which may not be specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, social justice, and religious issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

You understand that all Content posted on, transmitted through, or linked from the Phantoms and Monsters Site, are the sole responsibility of the person from whom such Content originated. You are responsible for all Content that you post, email or otherwise make available via the Phantoms and Monsters Site. Phantoms and Monsters does not control, and is not responsible for Content made available through the Phantoms and Monsters Site. By using the Phantoms and Monsters Site, you acknowledge that you may be exposed to Content from other users that is offensive, indecent, inaccurate, misleading, or otherwise objectionable.