Friday, May 22, 2009

Photos: UPDATED...Black Light Scans Reveal 'Glowing' Patches On Abductees



The following links are the account of a close encounter and possible abduction of a couple in Nevada on May 7th 2009. The images where anonymously uploaded on the MUFON report site...though it seems it is related to this incident because of the dates and location referenced. Are these cellphone images of the interior of an alien craft?

Boomerang-shaped UFO witnessed by young couple in Nevada desert

Possible UFO contact in Nevada

NOTE: I personally don't know what to make of these images and offer the information "as is". I have made some inquiries though, I am receiving zero response. If any further information on these images and the incident come to light, I will post an update...Lon

UPDATE: there has been no claim that these images were taken with a cellphone...it was only suggested as the easiest means to secure images. For those who are questioning that, fine...these images were posted 'as is'. For those mature enough to respond sensibly, I appreciate it. May I suggest that you go to the Phantoms and Monsters Wiki - Alien Images Thread if you wish to make comments. The blog comment mailbox is sending out an error message because of the heavy response and my email is blocking it.

____________________

UPDATE: Additional information has now been received concerning the recent experience of a young couple in Nevada. The two reported observing strange lights initially appearing to the east of their location. They saw three boomerang-shaped objects with five lights on each, one on the center, one on the middle of each side, and one on both ends of each object. As they watched intently, one of the objects separated, shut off three lights and appeared to be landing, or crashing. One of the witnesses indicated to Mufon field investigators that he has lived in the area all of his life and is familiar with every type of aircraft flying into, and out of a nearby Naval base. The witness further indicated that these objects did not resemble any conventional aircraft he has ever seen. After the initial sighting, the witness decided to chase the objects in his pick-up truck. He headed north, then turned east when one of the boomerang-shaped objects came along side to his left and appeared to begin pacing the truck. The object was about 100 yards away, and about twenty feet from the ground. There was also a second object following the witnesses from behind. The witness drove approximately 30 miles per hour, and the object stayed alongside, then he accelerated to 50 miles per hour and the object increased speed and stayed with the truck. It was at this time that the witness was able to describe the object as being about 50 feet across in size. The witness continued driving about five more miles until reaching a dead end, and then turned around. The witness pulled off of the road and came to a stop. At this time, there was an object behind their location, at an altitude of 50 feet, and an object circling above them at a similar altitude. The second witness (a passenger in the truck) described that the main body of the craft appeared silvery, but when it banked and turned it appeared to be transparent. The second witness also described what appeared to be two horizontal "grills" on the back of the object glowing red, similar to heating elements on a toaster or heater. The first witness went on to describe the movements of the objects to be similar to conventional aircraft - "banked like a plane would", and "made smooth movements like a plane". The objects stayed to the rear of the witnesses at all times, as if to be watching them.

The first witness decided to grab his father's spotlight and shine it on the circling object. The spotlight had an intensity of a million candle power. The witness took his hand and shaded the light off and on to "signal" the object. The object descended and approached even closer while circling above them at an altitude of twenty feet. The incident now takes on an interesting twist, as both witnesses could not remember what transpired after the light was directed to the object and they began signaling it. The second witness said that the next thing she remembered was being afraid and jumping back into the truck. The first witness agreed and remembered starting the ignition and continued driving towards the north to their respective homes. The first witness returned to the site, this time with his father. They report that the area was being combed by military helicopters and black SUV's with dark windows. Military personnel were also combing the area on foot, with flashlights. The witness, and his father decided not to approach the area any further. Helicopters were using spotlights to view the area from the air. The father of the second witness was a former security officer at the nearby Fallon Naval Air Station. The station reported that there had been three C-130 aircraft, in addition to an "unspecified aircraft incident" captured on their radar.

There now appears to be some physical abnormalities reported from both witnesses. The female witness reported three "itchy" bumps on her left leg. A black light scan revealed several glowing areas on the male's right forearm. He scrubbed the area very hard, but they would not come off. He also indicated that the areas were very "itchy" as well. The male witness went on to describe another outcome since the event. He normally has bouts of insomnia, but has felt a sense of gratification since the event, and now sleeps peacefully. The female witness, on the other hand, has been fearful and has had trouble sleeping since the incident. However, she continues to return to the site with her friend, who is watching and hoping for a return of the objects.


Source: Possible UFO contact in Nevada

********************

Are you interested in the paranormal, cryptozoology, UFOs and conspiracies? Go to Phantoms and Monsters Wiki and become a member of this unique network. Start a page on a subject or add your input to an existing page or thread. Phantoms and Monsters updates are posted daily at Twitter. Signup today!




 photo STRICKLER-SMALLBANNER_zps538bedc8.jpg

Search


Have you had a close encounter or witnessed something unusual? Send us an email


AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

16 Comments:

Blogger gilbavel said...

Okay, the first one, I see somebody's back.

The second one, looks like it could be... somebody's couch?

It's really too hard to tell.

Give them to Biedny and let him run his tests on them.

10:31 PM  
Blogger joseph said...

bottom pic looks like two legs in jeans, with the leg on the right showing the inside of a jean seam it appears

10:49 PM  
Blogger Don said...

The blue color is interesting, but could it be a filter? The first picture looks to be the heel of a humans hand/wrist. Im guessing there are more photos to come....

1:36 AM  
Blogger Tony M. said...

Looks to me like someone had their camera-phone in their hand and were accidentally taking pictures.

First image appears to be the heel of a hand and a wrist, which backs up my phone-in-hand theory. Looks like a filter was applied and the lines in the palm were smoothed out.

The second pic looks like the owner (possibly) of the phone was sitting on a soft surface, like a bed, and it looks like they were wearing a knit sweater, what with the left arm and elbow on the left, with the torso on the right. That makes sense, seeing as with a person sitting on a bed, the elbow would be just coming into the top of the frame where the top of the hip would be.

It looks like both images were taken in low light, and that can account for the blue tinge--or it could be a filter.

Accidental pics, I'd say. Certainly not of the inside of any ship, unless maybe a cruise ship. ;]

2:52 AM  
Blogger Tony M. said...

Sorry for the double post; I am unable to edit my previous post.

On second thought, looking at the pics, I see what looks like light reflection on the second pic, just below the center. The light source could be a black light positioned behind the camera, which I'd say would account for the blue tinge.

2:58 AM  
Blogger Gary said...

The second one looks to be an alien face looking down and if you look toward the bottom/middle there is a reflection of the person who shot the photo. It's unmistakable that there is a face reflecting off of a beam.

3:20 AM  
Blogger Joe said...

The first looks like a partial shot of someone's toes. The second, I agree with 'joseph'. Someone with one leg stretched out and one with a knee bent.

8:40 AM  
Blogger Douglas said...

First of all, if somebody managed to sneak a couple of quick pics inside an alien craft, this is what I would expect to see. They just have a spooky feel about them.

And secondly, all the guessing about arms, or legs, and beds , and couches, is classic matrixing... like seeing teddy bears, or faces, in the clouds.

I'm going with genuine, but who knows?

12:07 PM  
Blogger Richard said...

the first one is a pic of the floor with a narrow hall way ..looks man made ..

the second one is clearly a snap of there paint legs with blue jeans on ..

edit out the blue and you can see easy what i see .

5:39 PM  
Blogger Ebay's Used Digital Camera Alert!! said...

if you think about it.. if you were on a ufo craft and had a cellphone camera that you could beam to someone.. you'd definitely want to take a photo but you would also have to do it fast and w/o any 'one' seeing you do it? So it would make sense that a 'nervous' photo shot might be blurred or the back of someone might be shot as opposed to a 'take your time' shot of someone's face. So, that's pretty interesting. All in all though it's impossible to say anything definite.

8:35 PM  
Blogger Prof said...

I read a great deal on the topic of abductions. As an academician, my preferred sources are scholars such as John Mack and David Jacobs. I have read all their works, as well as Budd Hopkins.

In addition, I have taken the photos into Photoshop and examined them at various settings, including grayscale.

Interestingly, these photos are posted at print resolution, which is something not commonly found. It means a person could print off a copy because the resolution is high enough.

So, based on my reading and photo analysis, here are a few thoughts:

a) hypothesizing that the first photo is the back of an alien (a gray), it looks like it is examining the lower part of someone's shin. Also, it looks like a scraping or sample has been taken. See the lower middle of the upper left quarter of the first photo. There are two lines. They extend right to the alien's shoulder.

In one of my sources, I read that grays take tissue samples from the back of the shin. This could be the back of someone's shin.

I am thinking that the other abductee took the picture.

b) I think the second photo is of the alien's head peering on to something. I think I can see two eyes.



c) In many alien accounts, the abductees talk about the atmosphere inside the ship being very white and opaque. It is almost as if there is a white fog. Consequently, I wonder if it would photograph as blue. We don't know what forces are at work in these ships (i.e., form of lighting, etc.)

The photographing itself might be a problem with the credibility of these photographs. Reportedly, nothing of ours that is of an electronic or mechanical nature works in the presence of the ships. The cell phone, of course, is operating on its battery. I wonder about a cellphone working in such a situation.

d) Another credibility problem is the idea that one could even get a cellphone onto the ship. Reportedly, before "examinations" take place, abductees are asked to disrobe. So the cellphone would have to be left in the person's garments because it would not be allowed to stay with the person during the "exam."

Possibly, however, the photographing took place before the exam of the second person. Unlikely, however.

e) Also, in most abductions there are plenty of aliens around to watch. There are a couple tall grays and then the shorter ones. The shorter ones are "worker bees" and may be a type of robot. They take orders from the taller grays. So if this is the usual scenario, this situation would have to be the exception because the abductee was able to take a picture without getting caught.

f) Yet another problem is that the person would even be motivated to take such a photo. In most cases, it appears as though some sort of mind control is experienced by the abductee. They do not have any desire to fight or flee. They are complacent.

This is not always the case, however. There are reports of people who protest all the way through the alien "examination."

9:03 PM  
Blogger Regina said...

The first picture is a man's hand, palm up with fingers not visible. The second is a pair of knees clad in bluejeans.

10:14 PM  
Blogger Craig said...

Hmm.. look in the second image.. underneath the legs, it looks like a metal bar of some kind.. towards the centre of the "bar" there seems to be a reflection of a face.. could be human?? or not..? maybe its not even a bar...

9:19 AM  
Blogger J. Matthew said...

The first one appears to be someones wrist. The angle is from the fingertips (not in view). the muscle of the thumb area on up the wrist and forearm. As if someone was laying on a table.
The second one appears to be that of a gloved finger (maybe two) running over the top of something. Possibly the same wrist. Is it an autopsy? Or, at least, supposed to look like one?

1:47 PM  
Blogger Ebay's Used Digital Camera Alert!! said...

in shading the photos I now see why someone thought the photo showed 'jeans' you can see the pant seam that all jeans possess.. so I would agree with it on the second photo.. try to go into a photo editing program and fool around with the colors or brightness and you'll see things a bit different, somewhat clearer.

8:09 PM  
Blogger James said...

Anybody who seriously believes that these pictures were taken inside a ufo needs their head seen to! Some people will say anything for their 15 minutes of fame! Photographs are too easy to tamper with and fake to ever be hard evidence of anything.

11:21 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

PREVIOUS POSTS


Please help support
'Phantoms and Monsters'
Thanks!

Have you had a close encounter or witnessed something unusual?
Send us an email


* * * * *

Creative Commons License
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Hotlinking of P&M Network images and copyrighted material is strictly forbidden unless permission is obtained.

'Phantoms and Monsters' is protected under the Lanham (Trademark) Act (Title 15, Chapter 22 of the United States Code)


Disclaimer:
The publication of any and all content e.g., articles, reports, editorials, commentary, opinions, as well as graphics and or images on this web-site does not constitute sanction or acquiescence of said content unless specified; it is solely for informational purposes.

Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which may not be specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, social justice, and religious issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

You understand that all Content posted on, transmitted through, or linked from the Phantoms and Monsters Site, are the sole responsibility of the person from whom such Content originated. You are responsible for all Content that you post, email or otherwise make available via the Phantoms and Monsters Site. Phantoms and Monsters does not control, and is not responsible for Content made available through the Phantoms and Monsters Site. By using the Phantoms and Monsters Site, you acknowledge that you may be exposed to Content from other users that is offensive, indecent, inaccurate, misleading, or otherwise objectionable.