The Zapruder Film: Is It A Forgery?
Does this amateur film of the JFK assassination really show the truth of what happened, or has it been altered?The Zapruder film is a silent standard 8 mm color home movie of the presidential motorcade of John F. Kennedy through Dealey Plaza in Dallas, Texas, on November 22, 1963, filmed by a private citizen named Abraham Zapruder. The film is the most complete visual recording of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.
Zapruder testified before the Warren Commission that the frames published in Commission Exhibit 885 were from the film that he took.
Three other films of part of the assassination (the Orville Nix, Marie Muchmore and Charles Bronson films), together with numerous still photographs, are consistent with the Zapruder film, suggesting that they are all authentic.
In the Great Zapruder Film Hoax researchers started to realize that Zapruder’s film might also be a part of the lies and cover-up that agencies of the U.S. Government had weaved around the JFK assassination!
Scientists examined the Zapruder film. They found that, while most of it looks completely genuine, some of the images are impossible. They violate the laws of physics. They could not have come from Zapruder’s home movie camera.
Zapruder’s film is a very good forgery. It is almost perfect. Some mistakes took almost 40 years to find.
The scientists also proved that Zapruder’s film was not just changed a little bit. The whole film is a fake!
A movie film is just a strip of little photos (“frames”). The fake film was made by cutting and pasting real photos and film frames together to make new frames.
Because the Zapruder film is only 27 seconds long, less than 500 photos needed to be made. The forgers had almost a year to create them, before they were published. This was not difficult to do in 1963 and 1964. People had been creating high quality fake photos since the 1850s!
But what about the people who watched Zapruder’s film in the days after the assassination?
Film experts believe that a real film of the assassination was quickly altered on the evening of the assassination, using machines that could create Hollywood-style special effects (like Mary Poppins, created in 1964). Since the film was not shown on television, no one knows exactly what these people saw. But we do know that they described a film that is different to the film published in November 1964 as the “Zapruder film”!
In May 2003, scientists and researchers presented their latest findings at a conference in Duluth, Minnesota. This has now been described in a book, The Great Zapruder Film Hoax, published in September 2003.
Are you interested in the paranormal, cryptozoology, UFOs and conspiracies? Go to Phantoms and Monsters Wiki and become a member of this unique network. Start a page on a subject or add your input to an existing page or thread. Phantoms and Monsters updates are posted daily at Twitter. Signup today!













1 Comments:
This is an intriguing story, but I'm lost at the phrase about the machine that made special effects like in the film Mary Poppins. There was no such machine. The effects in Mary Poppins were the result of painstaking photographic lab work combined with practical effects done live. There was no computer or special machine that put it all together like we do today. It was all handled through hands-on chemical and optical processes in the days when taking pictures meant a roll of film dropped off at the developers.
It may be that the Zapruder film was altered, but they certainly didn't whip together a quick CGI-like sequence.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home